RSS

National home price up to $454,342, thanks to Vancouver and Toronto markets

 
Upward chart via Shutterstcok

 

Canadian home prices increased 12% in 2015, but only thanks to the strong markets in B.C. and Ontario.

In December 2015, the average home price across the country sat at $454,342, but if the hot Greater Vancouver and Greater Toronto markets are excluded, the price would only have been $336,994. Even more drastic, if B.C. and Ontario markets were excluded, home prices would have actually dropped by 2.2% down to $294,363.

The numbers are the latest from the Canadian Real Estate Association’s December 2015 report, but despite the ongoing price inflation in Vancouver and Toronto, the CREA says the Canadian housing market as a whole is stable.

 

“December mirrored the main themes of 2015, with strong sales activity and price growth across much of British Columbia and Ontario offsetting declines in activity among oil producing regions,” said Gregory Klump, CREA’s Chief Economist. “The recent decline and uncertain outlook for oil prices means that housing market prospects are unlikely to improve in the near term in regions where job market prospects are tied to oil production.”

Two storey single family homes made the biggest price jump of all housing types, rising 9.15% across the country. One storey homes rose 6.63%, townhouses rose 6.12% and apartments rose on average 4.96%.

The biggest markets, Vancouver and Toronto, rose 18.87% and 10% respectively. The Fraser Valley was not far behind Vancouver with an impressive price jump of 14.35%.

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

 

Image: CREA

Image: CREA

Read

 

Why homeowners and buyers can expect more mortgage rate hikes from the big banks

 

Katia Dmitrieva and Ari Altstedter, Bloomberg News
Thursday, Jan. 7, 2016

A slowing economy, and tougher mortgage rules are making it harder for Canadian banks to squeeze out profit from mortgages. Wire services

Falling government-bond yields are usually good for homeowners in Canada because mortgage rates tend to follow suit. Not this time.

Three of Canada’s biggest lenders have raised mortgage rates and more increases are expected as new regulations, a weak economy and higher costs prevent banks from capitalizing on lower borrowing rates in the debt market where they finance their mortgages.

“When you look at the funding picture, it’s getting more expensive for the banks,” Meny Grauman, a financial analyst at Cormark Securities in Toronto, said by phone Wednesday. “We’ve started to see cracks in credit and we know that’s probably going to continue to intensify. If it continues, the same logic that caused the banks to raise will continue to apply.”

The higher mortgage rates add to measures by the federal government and the national housing agency to cool the housing market, which the Bank of Canada has identified as one of the major risks to the economy. Housing prices in Vancouver and Toronto have almost doubled in the past decade, raising concern that a market crash could lead to a rash of loan defaults.

Even as speculation mounts the Bank of Canada could return interest rates to a record low this year, homeowners face higher mortgage costs as the banks look to protect their bottom lines in a deteriorating economy. This week, Royal Bank of Canada became the latest lender to raise its mortgage rates, following Toronto-Dominion Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia.

Rate cut

Yields on five-year benchmark government bonds, the part of the market where banks usually fund their mortgage lending, touched the lowest since August on Wednesday as new signs of slowing growth in China pushed the price of crude oil below US$35 per barrel. That led derivatives traders to assign a more than 50 per cent chance the Bank of Canada will cut the benchmark interest rate to its record low of 0.25 per cent by mid-year.

The only other time Canada’s benchmark interest rates were that low was 2009, and it kicked off a housing boom fueled by rising oil prices and cheap mortgage rates. This time around, bond yields are falling because the economic trouble is hitting much closer to home, with a deteriorating outlook for exports along with an inflated housing market.

The banks are feeling the pinch with higher borrowing costs as pressures on the economy make them look less credit-worthy. Investors now demand about 129 extra basis points of yield to hold five-year bonds from top-rated Canadian banks compared with government benchmark notes, the biggest premium tracked by Bloomberg data since 2010. That premium was 51 basis points at the end of 2009.

Paying up

“Given the Canadian banks are a play on the Canadian economy, a slowdown in the economy can’t really be seen as positive for the banks,” Kris Somers, a Canadian debt analyst at Bank of Montreal, said by phone from Toronto. “Banks are paying more money for debt than they have in the past.”

In addition to the higher borrowing costs generally, new government rules are also imposing higher costs on mortgage lending. Canada Mortgage & Housing Corp. increased the fees it charges banks to securitize mortgage debt and the Department of Finance increased the minimum down payment requirement for insured mortgages. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, the bank regulator, also proposed higher capital buffers to back the loans. Canadian lenders hold 75 per cent of the country’s mortgages.

Margin buffer

With the bank increases, the rate on a five-year fixed mortgage at Royal Bank rises to 3.04 per cent on Jan. 8, from 2.94 per cent. The five-year variable rate, tied to the bank’s prime rate, rises to 2.6 per cent from 2.45 per cent. Toronto-based Royal is the country’s No. 2 bank by assets.

The government announcements were made to cool a housing market that’s been on a tear, with housing prices nationwide rallying 27 per cent in the last five years, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association. Vancouver and Toronto have outpaced other cities, prompting concern from the Bank of Canada and Fitch Ratings Inc., among others. Home sales flew to a record in Toronto and Vancouver in 2015 and prices continued their climb. The average price rallied 9.5 per cent to $609,110 in December in Toronto and jumped 19 per cent to $760,900 in Vancouver, according to those cities’ real estate boards.

The trend of banks maintaining a margin buffer even with lower costs in the public debt market started last year, when the Bank of Canada cut its overnight lending rate and the banks didn’t pass the full savings onto consumers through their prime lending rate. The prime rate is used to price everything from variable mortgage rates to lines of credit. The same thought process prevails this year, Grauman said, as banks try to eke out profit in a tough economic environment.

“‘Flat’ is the new ‘up,'” Grauman said. “You’re just trying to hold the line on your margin.”

Bloomberg News

 

Read

BC couple says home warranty insurance offers little protection

Tina and Ben Wilson are still fighting with the insurance provider handling their new home warranty claim.

Tina and Ben Wilson are still fighting with the insurance provider handling their new home warranty claim.

Global News
A A

A Coquitlam couple says B.C.’s home warranty insurance has failed them and there needs to be more government oversight.

In March 2013, Tina and Ben Wilson moved into a newly constructed home on Coquitlam’s Burke Mountain. Now, almost three years later, they are still fighting with the insurance provider handling their new home warranty claim.

“You buy your dream home and it turns into a nightmare,” says Tina.

 

The home came with home warranty insurance. By law, all residential builders in B.C. must have third-party home warranty insurance on new homes before getting a building permit. The Wilsons say soon after they moved in, they noticed a number of deficiencies including electrical issues, drainage problems with water settling against the house and mold in the basement suite. They decided to file a new home warranty claim.

“We let them know in August about the mold in the basement suite and by November we knew we were in for a fight,” says Tina.

The Wilsons say the insurer, Aviva Insurance Company of Canada represented by National Home Warranty Group, sent a third-party investigator to look into the mold problem. Initially, the couple says they were told nothing was wrong.

“The builder, the insurer, and the third party all came in and said the ventilation system was working fine and installed to code,” says Tina. “When we pushed back and hired engineers and hired environmental specialists, they found that not only was it not functioning at all, but it wasn’t installed to code.”

The insurance company eventually accepted the findings and began the remedial work. However, the Wilsons say the experience with  home warranty insurance has been an uphill battle.

“If you are willing to fight. If you are persistent. If you don’t go away quietly, then new home warranty eventually might do something to help you a little bit,” says Tina.

The Homeowner Protection Office, which is a branch of BC Housing, monitors the performance of home warranty insurance, but it has no authority to regulate warranty providers or insurance brokers. Consumer Matters reached out to BC Housing Minister Rich Coleman, but he declined our request for an interview. Instead, we were referred to the Homeowner Protection Office.

Vice president and registrar Wendy Acheson says, “I believe most homeowners are very satisfied with the system and when you look at the number of homes being built where we don’t get any complaints [it’s] enormous. The number of complaints we get is actually 0.2 per cent of the number of homes that are being built.”

Acheson says there are a number of tools available to the homeowner should they run into trouble. A complaint can be made to the Financial Institutions Commission which regulates insurance providers. A homeowner can also institute mandatory mediation.

But realtor and homeowner advocate John Grasty says there’s little protection for the homeowner because they are forced to use a home warranty company selected by the builder.

“In my opinion what protection that is offered is worthless,” Grasty adds.

“There’s not enough political will. I don’t think enough consumers are speaking out. A lot of them can’t be bothered. It’s just too much of a huge organization to be arguing with. ”

Home inspector Ted Gilmour agrees. He says many of his clients are frustrated by the system.

“I think it’s disingenuous of the government to insist on you buying into that system that does not protect you because you have to sue the builder to get anything done is my experience.”

As for Tina and Ben, fighting with their insurance provider and the handling of their new home warranty claim has become a full-time job.

“You quickly realize going through the process, your idea of what is there is a complete misconception,” says Ben. “There’s no one literally there to help the homeowner.”

The Homeowner Protection Office says the province plans to review new home warranty insurance regulations in 2016.

© Shaw Media, 2016

Read

Greater Vancouver real estate assessments grew by $90 billion in 2015

Dan Pigott REMAX Vancouver / Facebook

 

The annual BC Assessment numbers are in, and the data shows a staggering growth in real estate values across the province.

The total assessments in Greater Vancouver grew from $546.7 billion in 2015 to $636.2 billion in 2016, a 16% growth in 12 months. A sample of East Vancouver single-family homes saw the greatest growth at a 28% increase in value, outpacing the pricey West Side neighbourhoods which still made a strong leap at 23%.

Google Map screenshot

SEE ALSO: Top 25 most expensive homes in Greater Vancouver

Other neighbourhoods where sample assessment values grew over 20% included the Hamilton area in North Vancouver, the West Vancouver waterfront, Garibaldi Highlands in Squamish, Capitol Hill and Buckingham in Burnaby, and Westwood Plateau in Coquitlam.

 

“The 2016 assessments are indicating significant increases from 2015,” says Assessor Jason Grant. “Increases of 15-25 per cent will be typical for single-family homes in Vancouver, North Vancouver, West Vancouver, Burnaby, Tri-Cities, New Westminster and Squamish. Single-family market movement in Whistler, Pemberton and the Sunshine Coast is less dramatic, with typical increases in the zero to 15 per cent range. Typical strata residential increases throughout the region will be in the five to 10 per cent range.”

BC Assessment says owners of more than 500,000 homes in Greater Vancouver will be receiving their property assessments for 2016 in the mail this week. The numbers reflected in the assessments show market value as of July 1, 2015.

West Vancouver

SEE ALSO: 26,000 sq. ft. West Vancouver monster home is too big, residents say

“Property owners can find detailed property information on our website including answers to many assessment-related questions, but those who feel that their property assessment does not reflect market value as of July 1, 2015 or see incorrect information on their notice, should contact BC Assessment as indicated on their notice as soon as possible in January,” says Grant.

Assessment values provide data to determine how much property tax owners must pay each year. Those who experience a larger increase in their property values will be required to pay more tax in 2016.

The total number of homes on the BC Assessment list this year reached 1,996,112 and were valued at $1.34 trillion, an increase of 11.1% from 2015.

 

Image: BC Assessment

Image: BC Assessment

Read

Gregor Robertson pleads for new taxes to curb unaffordable housing market

 
Mayor Gregor Robertson

Vancouver’s Mayor has had it with the city’s growing real estate problem.

In the wake of BC Assessment’s 2016 property value data release, Gregor Robertson is calling for two new taxes to curb the “runaway price growth”.

City Hall watchdogs will note that Robertson has his hands tied when it comes to implementing any taxes on property ownership, which is only something that can be done at the provincial or federal level, but that hasn’t stopped him from pleading with the higher-ups for action.

 

“Far too many families on modest incomes cannot afford to live in our city or even in this region, which has enormous consequences for Vancouver’s economy and quality of life,” Robertson wrote in a statement issued Tuesday.

“This week’s BC Assessment numbers only underscore the urgency of a combination of reasonable and responsible actions that must be taken by the BC and Federal governments.”

Google Map screenshot

SEE ALSO: Top 25 most expensive homes in Greater Vancouver

The Mayor informally proposed a speculation tax that would help to slow down the practice of flipping homes, which he says treats housing like a commodity and intensifies the price escalation. He also suggested a luxury housing tax to ensure “the very weathiest buyers or investors pay an added price.” No values on what these taxes may be or who specifically they might target were noted.

He added that income from these taxes could go toward building affordable housing for the low- and middle-income earners.

While proposing the two taxes, Robertson also called for better tracking of data on international investment and absentee ownership, something both the Federal and Provincial governments have refused to look into.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently told Global News in a Christmas Day interviewbroadcast that he is wary about taking action against foreign ownership as it may “devalue the equity of what a lot of people have in their homes right now.”

“You have to be very, very cautious about restricting foreign investment in our country at a time where we know we need foreign investment in businesses and resource development,” said Trudeau.

B.C. Premier Christy Clark has previously echoed these concerns as her excuse against collecting data on the issue.

Read

Rich homeowners in B.C. aren't paying their property taxes, and it's 100% legal

 
+Property tax via Shutterstock

A property tax deferral program is the latest way Vancouver homeowners are taking advantage of their high-value homes to make a small fortune.

The B.C. program allows residents aged 55 and older, widows, and people with disabilities to defer paying their property taxes until the sale of their home, while only paying a 0.85% interest rate. When implemented in the 1970s, it suited both the common retiring age and the stagnant real estate market at the time, but is now being taken advantage of by wealthy homeowners.

The purpose of the program is a sound one, says NDP MLA David Eby, a critic of the B.C. Liberal’s affordable housing legislation. It is supposed to ensure that seniors and others on fixed incomes aren’t forced out of their homes due to property tax increases when their home value grows. But, the program was designed in the 1970s for the realities of the 1970s real estate market, which is very different than it is now in 2016, adds Eby.

 

There are over $130 million in deferred property taxes each year, income for the various districts and municipalities that could be used to build roads, fund school boards, maintain parks, and pay local police and fire authorities. While many use the program responsibly – half of B.C. seniors live on $24,000 per year or less and more than 50,000 seniors are living on $20,000 or less, according to Seniors Advocate B.C. – changes in the common age of retirement means many over 55 are still making generous incomes.

According to the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Commission, adults aged 55 to 64 made the highest average personal income of all age categories in 2011. More than half of this group own their homes mortgage-free, and there’s no shortage of them in Canada: what are called “pre-seniors” make up 13.1% of the country’s total population.

With the aging population – the number of people over age 55 by 2038 are projected to equal the populations of Ontario, Alberta, and Saskatchewan combined – the amount of money lost each year due to the property tax deferral program will only continue to grow.

While Eby says there are flaws with the program itself, most notably that it is not at all based on proven financial need, he blames the province’s inaction toward affordable housing as the reason why the program is being taken advantage of.

Mayor Gregor Robertson

SEE ALSO: Gregor Robertson pleads for new taxes to curb unaffordable housing market

“Like the shortage of rental housing, like the unaffordability of housing, and the increase of homelessness, the province needs to start fixing the programs from the 1970s to fit with 2016,” he told Vancity Buzz.

“When you look at the action the government has taken to address out of control housing prices, two days ago they gave a break on property taxes to people who were buying $1.2 million homes. And this program, they provide less than 1% interest-rate loans to people who could potentially be earning millions of dollars a year so they don’t have to pay their property taxes. If student loans were at this property tax deferral rate, they’d be in a much better position financially. But students aren’t the priority.”

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Finance says there are currently 38,000 homeowners using the property tax deferral program and the average amount of deferred taxes per household is $3,000 a year.

In one scenario, a 60-year-old homeowner in North Vancouver might pay $8,000 a year in property tax on a standard $1.6 million house. If that house continues to rise in price by $200,000 a year for the next 15 years, by the time the homeowner wants to move at age 75, their house would be worth $4.6 million. Assuming their tax rate hasn’t changed, they would have deferred $248,000 in property tax over the years – money which they may have chosen to invest for profit. They would have only paid just over $1,900 in interest.

David Eby says the program is clearly subsidizing people who don’t deserve it or need it. “It just shows where [the Provincial Government’s] concerns are with housing affordability,” he adds.

Read

Fraser Valley December 2015.

 

Click on the picture for video!


 

 

 

Greater Vancouver December 2015

 

 


Metro Vancouver December 2015

 

Read


ASSESSED VALUE vs. MARKET VALUE: WHY THE DIFFERNCE?

 

Each year property owners anticipate and potentially brace themselves for their property tax assessment. The assessment arrives, but more often than not, the bottom line has a gap between it and the current market value, current market value being the higher of the two. Why is that? In order to understand this variance it’s important to know the difference between assessed value and market value, and how a Realtor® establishes the asking price for a property.


What is assessed value?

Every year properties are assessed for their current value based on the standard Provincial system for determining annual property taxes. In British Columbia, BC Assessment (BCA) conducts these assessments. A number of factors are considered in the assessment process, but typically the age and size of the real property, its location along with construction materials form the basis for the assessment. Once the assessed value is determined, property taxes are charged back to the current property owner based on a percentage rate. Think of assessed value as the tax value.


What is market value?

Market value is the estimated price that a house will sell for within a projected period of time that is considered reasonable. Market value is based on current averages and on the typical buyer for a property in that area. Keep in mind, there are specific buyers who fall in love at first sight and will pay any price to own that same property. When we say the typical buyer, we aren’t talking about this very specific buyer.


Why are assessed values (property tax assessments) generally less than market values?

There is a lot of confusion between assessed value and market value. Ideally a property’s assessed value should be the same as market value, but it seldom is. Tax assessors are required to determine the value of properties in the area as outlined above, but they are not required to adjust the assessed value to align with the current market value. However, at times you may experience a leap in your assessed value; behind the leap is BC Assessment working to catch up to market value, and this does not happen often.


How does a Realtor® determine your property value?

A Realtor® uses the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) and its current market analysis data to compare your property with similar properties that have recently sold in the area. The key word is similar. Realtors® also do a thorough walk-through of your property, both inside and out, to note specific details about your property that either set it apart in a positive way, or may need attention in terms of home improvements, and/or repairs and maintenance. This walk-through combined with the MLS data is how a Realtor® establishes the market value of your property.

In neighbourhoods where property lots and houses are similar, the estimated values will be similar as well. In the case of unique homes such as character homes, this is where establishing value becomes more challenging. Subtle differences with unique homes are hard to summarize in a data table and are difficult to equate value to, much like homes with ‘views’ where the question becomes, is the view worth $50,000 or $100,000?


In the end, with this 2016 Rea Estate market, that’s when it depends on who is buying. And that’s where the experience and expertise of Jessica Prasad come in to help establish a property value for your home.




*courtesy of Duttons Property Management

Read

China’s market turmoil likely to have impact on B.C. real estate, say economists

 BY CHUCK CHIANG, VANCOUVER SUN JANUARY 7, 2016 6:11 PM 

 
China’s market turmoil likely to have impact on B.C. real estate, say economists
 

A screen in Shanghai shows Chinese stock prices in steep decline before being brought to a halt on Thursday. It was the second market halt in the four trading days of 2016.

Photograph by: ChinaFotoPress , Getty Images

The stock market upheaval in China this week could convince Chinese investors to move their money into assets not linked to the renminbi currency, including B.C. real estate, in even greater volumes, according to a Canadian economist.

But Scotiabank Economics vice-president Derek Holt also cautions that there is considerable uncertainly regarding how Beijing will proceed with devaluing its currency in a bid to make the renminbi more market-driven. Some options could have adverse effects on the local housing market.

Chinese stock markets opened 2016 with four straight days of losses, several of which were so dramatic that a “circuit-breaker” was triggered when the main index dropped more than seven per cent.

On Thursday, Beijing also further devalued the renminbi against the U.S. dollar by 0.51 per cent, which added to the extended sell-off, Holt said.

“When you are a saver in China and you see that your government is trying to make exports more competitive and creating more balance in the economy, it’s natural for you to say, ‘Oh my God, I need to get my savings out and protect my family,’” he said. “And I think it’s that rush-for-the-exits, the large pickups in capital flows out of China, that’s indicative of what’s happening.”

Holt noted that Chinese investors will likely look to the U.S. dollar as a main investment instrument, but he noted the Canadian dollar’s persistent weakness has also made real estate in Vancouver more attractive.

“Canadian real estate ... because our own currency has depreciated so much ... that has put Canadian assets on sale from the vantage point of, say, Asian investors,” Holt said. “If we judge Vancouver and Toronto in that context, it’s not cheap for us here in Canada … but in the context of other Pacific-Rim cities like San Francisco or Singapore, and given our currency depreciation and what you can buy cashing in on foreign currencies, we look pretty cheap right now.”

TD Economics senior economist Leslie Preston said it is difficult to say if the market panic will lead to more Chinese money coming to Canada, given the lack of data tracking the exact impact of Asian buyers on B.C.’s housing prices.

But she said the upheaval has already hit Canada, noting that the TSX has dropped about five per cent this week because of events in China and falling oil prices.

“I think we’ve already seen it spill over to equity markets elsewhere in the world,” Preston said. “We’ve seen oil head lower this week, which is very important for Canadian equity. So to that extent, we’ve already seen it in the Canadian markets.”

But Preston said Beijing has some controls in place to prevent capital moving offshore, which will limit the number of buyers driven to the Canadian market. And she stressed that a TD Economics forecast for a slower Chinese economy — with a 6.2-per-cent annual growth rate for 2016 — has not changed in light of this week’s developments.

“China is slowing, we’ve known that for a number of years, and we haven’t seen any data that would lead us to downgrade our outlook further,” Preston said. “I think it’s important to take a step back and remember that financial markets are always a lot more volatile than the underlying economies. Financial markets are by their nature very, very volatile, and if you take a look at China, there hasn’t been a lot of new news out about the state of the economy.”

Andreas Schotter, a professor of international business at the Ivey Business School at the University of Western Ontario, said the Chinese stock market malaise is being driven by the fact that individuals make up 80 per cent of investors, meaning volatility tends to be higher in comparison to markets where institutional investors are more prominent.

Schotter said that the “circuit-breaker” mechanism may itself have contributed to the problems this week, setting off a panic.

“The ‘circuit breaker’ is also being used by the S&P 500, but only at the 20-per-cent drop level,” he said, noting the seven-per-cent limit may be too low for Shanghai. “Until more institutional investors participate in the market, I do not see that the Chinese ‘circuit breaker’ makes much sense. In fact, instead of reducing panic in the market, it triggers a massive sell-off once it is lifted.”

Schotter also agreed that more Chinese investors may be looking to protect their money by purchasing assets in Canada and other foreign markets.

“I think ‘exodus’ is too harsh of a word, but for sure, investors will try to balance their portfolios more away from the renminbi,” he said, while also noting any expectations of a huge wave of overseas investment should be tempered. “For the average individual investor in China, (getting money out) is not as easy as it is for a Canadian investor in Canada. (But) for those who are able to move money out of China, Vancouver and other metropolitan real estate in Canada remain very attractive, particular right now with an undervalued loonie.”

Holt said that, while uncertainty in Shanghai may drive some money into Vancouver’s real estate market, Beijing has a number of options to further devalue the renminbi and spur exports. One of those, he noted, is a one-time, large-scale devaluation similar to the one in Argentina in 2002, when the peso lost considerable value within days of being de-pegged from the U.S. dollar.

While he said there are no signs that Chinese regulators will take such a step, the uncertainty is not helped by current measures, which Holt called “somewhat flawed” and “opaque.”

“If you do a large, sudden devaluation (of the renminbi), then what happens?” he said. “And you’d probably accompany that with stricter capital controls to prevent people from getting around it in the short term. What that does is it wipes out, with one swift stroke of the pen, a fair portion of Chinese household savings. And what is driving foreign appetite for real estate abroad, including markets like Vancouver? Those household savings.”

chchiang@vancouversun.com



Read more:http://www.vancouversun.com/business/china+market+turmoil+likely+have+impact+real+estate+economists/11637481/story.html#ixzz3wcRQGtro

Read

Tired of grocery bags ripping before you get you your apartment?

 Tired of long walks in the Rain?  

Time to start looking for a house....

 

Read